Time to move? NOW!

So I was walking out of my office into the library when I looked over at a row of computers.  There was a girl typing a paper and a boy sitting next to her working.  What caught my eye wasn't that the boy was working on the computer, but he was sitting back in the chair with one leg crossed over the other and a tablet in his lap.  I asked him what he was up to, and he said he was doing some research.  I asked him why he wasn't using the computer.  Thinking he was in trouble, he started to put his tablet away and was sliding his chair in to log in to the computer, but I assured him it was okay that he was using the tablet, I was just wondering why he made the choice to use a tablet with a perfectly good computer in front of him.  He didn't know the answer, but I had a pretty good idea.  He was using the tool he felt most comfortable with, a tablet.
It is time for schools to move on and use the tools with which students want to and need to learn.  Students have always wanted to use the most recent gadgets and technology, so why limit them?  This is a great opportunity for education to show students that using smartphones, tablets and e-readers is okay to learn and communicate with, but we need to teach ethical and proper use of these in the educational and world setting.
I feel that I may be preaching to the choir because many schools seem to be heading the way of one-to-one and BYOD, but it also seems that caution is a hindrance and not a safe open door.  We need to protect students and school networks but we don't need an iron curtain keeping information out and students frustrated.  A moderate security policy with clear expectations as well as instruction of staff and students on proper use of technology would go a long way in creating a 21st century environment.
My vision is that technology isn't locked in a computer lab or classroom or any one room or area in a school, but rather it is a part of the school environment.  Technology could be used anywhere, so learning isn't limited to a specific place, but rather it just happens.  Students find the answer to their query in the hall on the way to class, they complete a presentation at the lunch table, they record an interview in the classroom or office, and on and on.
There are problems that will occur, there always are and there always were even before computer/wi-fi technology.  But with an honest and effective approach, the problems should be minimal.  Is it worth the risk?  I believe so.

Internet Security

Last year at our school, the IT director and I started a series of Internet safety lessons that we teach to each different grade in the school from 6th to 12th grades. We cover topics from evaluating websites for research to Social Networking.  What is always interesting is that the students almost always know more about certain aspects and features of using the Internet than we do, but rarely do they know or even think about anything regarding securing their own personal information and identity.
This week we did a lesson with sixth grade on using Facebook and other social networking websites.  The students were familiar with the workings of Facebook and helped me browse around my own site, but by a show of hands, less than half of them who have an account (which is about 65% of them), had ever visited, to their knowledge, the security section of Facebook to set up the security parameters.  This verified for us that the topic of our lesson was needed, but this is concerning.  My hope is that when students of any age 6-12 grades open a social networking account, that not only parents and adult family visit frequently, but that they also help with talking about and setting security parameters.  However, I visited many of the students' Facebook sites as a "non-friend" to discover that many of them are wide open to view and post. Scary.
We close our presentation telling the students that social networking sites are not bad, but sometimes bad people ruin good things.  They should use Facebook, Skype, Twitter and other social networking sites when their parents allow, but they must be smart about how they use them.  We highly recommend they talk with their parents about the security of their sites and encourage them to visit the security section of whatever site they use. "Go there today!" we say.  Just like everything else in education and working with kids, we know that several will not do anything.  Maybe because they think nothing bad will happen to them, maybe because they just forget in their busy day and minds, or maybe because they are not sure they really understand.  Hopefully, the lesson will get them to think about these issues and someday they will take action to protect themselves.

Is our society asking too much of teachers?

The simple answer to the title of this post is: YES. I always try to remind my friends who work in the private sector that the product of education is the mind of a human being. And while there are a number of responsibilities that teachers must accept and hone, there are many responsibilities that teachers are expected to address that they have little or no control over. And these are things that include basic needs like sleep, security, nutrition, and basic resources. A student who comes to a classroom without these needs being met will not be as effective of a student as the student who comes rested, well fed, and from a secure home with resources. On the same note though, a student who is spoon fed, gets his or her way at home, lives without needs and gets what he or she wants regularly, this student often lacks the discipline or motivation to succeed. Teachers have no control over who walks into the classroom or what that student brings with him or herself.

I digress a bit from what my original intent was here. I want to direct my readers to an Washington Post/Answer Sheet Blog by Valerie Strauss titled "Teachers: Blame Only Where Blame is Due." In this post, Strauss identifies 16 variables that affect student achievement. When I look at these variables, I would identify only four that a teacher has direct influence. About three to four more of those are the responsibility of the school and the rest, nine variables, are up to the individuals raising the child.

I encourage you to read the link to Strauss's post to learn the 16 variables and see if you agree, but I believe that her 16 variable prove that education is not only on the shoulders of teachers. Education is a community effort. Teachers are not off the hook. They must be dedicated to their work, profession and students. Just as schools must be dedicated to their teachers, building, and community, and parents must take an interest and dedicate themselves to their students not just at home, but on the streets and at school.

Oh, what about the students? Everyone seems to forget about them in the discussion about "What's wrong with Eduction, these days?" More and more students seem to have a sense of entitlement. That it is their right to do what they please and if they want to fail, that is their right, too. Is this what we believe as Americans? I believe that should be addressed as well. Is the answer stricter discipline, harsher punishment, higher or lower expectations? I don't know. But I do know that the attitude a student brings to the classroom has a large impact on not only his or her achievement, but also those around him or her.

Teachers have a lot to manage and most do an excellent job of it. Does our society ask too much. Indeed, it does.

History's history

I found myself reading a CNN article online called Subject Matters: Why students fall behind on history. History as a subject is one of my favorites because of the way it impacts everything we do. With a good understanding of history, we have a much better understanding and appreciation of how our world, country, state, etc. work.

The article states how history is being shortchanged because it is not a mandated No Child Left Behind subject and even though it is a growing subject, because history is new yesterday and will be new again tomorrow, the history classroom gets no additional time to cover the subjects. One individual commented below the article that history classes cover basically colonialism to World War II. I would consider that a sizable amount of information in a two semester course.

What I found to be, in my opinion, very sad was what one teacher was quoted as saying. He said, "I think they (students) learn information by itself, in isolation, but putting the big picture together is not happening." I would argue that when students learn history in isolation it keeps them from learning the big picture. My experience has shown that teaching history in the context of other disciplines like English, music, and art help students to understand the cultural values of the people they are studying, which in turn helps them to place the events of the day in time. Integrating history also helps students to understand why people reacted and passed policies, started wars, migrated. The photographs and discussion of the photographers of the 1930's help students to understand the people and conditions. A study of the music and poetry helps students to understand the Great Migration of the 1920's. And an understanding of the rise of cities and industrialism, in turn, helps us to understand why the poetry and music changed.

When I taught an American Studies, combined US history and American Literature class, my co-teacher and I enjoyed challenging the students to think and discuss, what affects what. Does history impact literature or did the literature affect the history. Sometimes it was clear and sometimes it was not.

The article mentions that teachers use history as a "throw in" (in quotes because that is how I interpreted it) to help improve reading skills. A noble attempt; but if we want to confuse students as one teacher was quoted as saying that students could identify an event like the Declaration of Independence but they could not identify the century it happened, we should continue just "throwing in" history to "improve" reading. Agreed that most of the state testing reading selections are non-fiction and some are historical, others are scientific, and others are literary. The answer to improving student test scores is to teach reading in all subjects, not just English class.

I have traditionally been opposed to a national curriculum, but articles like this make me realize that maybe we (the teaching community) cannot prioritize. We struggle, not because we lack professionalism, not because we lack passion, not because we lack know-how, but because we lack leadership. Perhaps it is time for the education community to take decision making out of non-teacher hands. It has been a mystery to me what qualifies a elected officials to make decisions about what should be taught and tested. Elected officials should oversee schools, the money, and hold schools accountable, but educators should be in charge of the what and how.

I have ideas, but I don't have the answers. I sure would like to see some real discussion on a national level. History class is not the problem. It is one of the many problems. What do you think?

Really good blog post

As you may have noticed in yesterday's post, I am reinventing "The Cycling Librarian" blog. Well, it might be considered more like giving the ball a kick after it got stuck in some tall grass. Anyway, I am participating in Edublog's Teacher Challenge where I will complete 30 activities to help my blogging skills improve. I know all one of you will really appreciate this which is why there is probably only one of you (thanks mom) currently reading. Today's activity is to find a good blog post and comment on it. Since I subscribe to several good blogs this activity is not much trouble.

I really enjoy reading Scott McLeod's blog "Dangerously!Irrelevant." Here is the link to his most recent post which is especially timely. It is called Blogging v. teaching. As the title of the post indicates, he poses the questions, "do you see blogging as an extension of your teaching? If not, should you? On the flip side, do you see teaching as an extension of your blogging?"

One thing that I like about his post is that he does explicitly ask the reader questions in which he intends an answer. This works for him because he has several comments which follow the post. I also like that he includes other links that relate to the topic being discussed.

Now, the reason I was especially interested in his topic is because when I look at the goals I listed in yesterday's post, teaching is a big part of what I wanted to do with my blog. I enjoy blogs because they act as a way to think, but where others can think with you. I never pretend to be the authority on any topic in which I write, so I hope no one ever thinks that when they read my thoughts. I put them in the blog because it is what I am thinking and I am curious what others think. If I am certain about something, it will be clearly stated something like this, "I know this to be true." or "I am certain that..." Otherwise, it is all open to discussion. As always, what do you think?