That's a middle school book in the high school library!!!

I've read some discourse over the last month on the library listserve regarding below grade level books in "upper" school libraries.  In my case as a high school librarian,  I often wonder if I should have Tim Green, Mike Lupica, Rick Riordan, Christopher Paul Curtis, Rita Williams-Garcia or Melody Carlson on the shelf to name a few.  These authors are poplular and kids have often read them by the time they have gotten to the high school, but I find that the titles are frequently requested and other students are constatntly recommending them to their friends who haven't read them yet.

In the back of my mind I have this phrase "college and career ready" that makes me think, "Jeez, these kids have already read these books or these books are written at a really low level for high school." so should I offer them to the students?  Is my library "Common Core?" Are Riordan or Williams-Garcia's books getting the students "career ready?"  I mean, they are just "kids books," right?

While that is all true (I guess), is there harm in reading something for fun that is "below level?"  Reading is reading, especially when the books are written by award winning authors and they are well written.  This is a problem I have when looking at schools that have tight Accellerated Reader reading rules for children.  I have heard numerous horror stories and have heard some from my daughter's school that students are not allowed to read anything at school that isn't in their exact reading level.  That is a shame.  I get it that students can read at home and that parents should be there to help choose books, but we all know happens in fewer households that we want to know.  I understand the basis of the AR rules but what a way to discourage a student from reading something that is exciting to them whether it is above or below level.  I do not  understand why a student can't choose something in his or her level to measure progress for the school and choose something that is of interest to them outside (above or below) their level.  If the book is out of the realm for a student, a teacher or certified librarian making suggestions if the book is way below or above with a comment like, "I see you want to read "blank" I think it will be to "hard/easy," why don't you try "blank? It is a lot like the book you chose." would be really effective.  However, if the student insists, the conversation ends with, "Okay, let me know what you think of it and keep this book in mind when you are finished."  I just don't see the benefit of taking a book a student is excited about reading out of his or her hands.

With that idea in mind, I proudly purchase a mix of reading levels (I do not label the books with reading levels by the way!) and encourage even the best and highest readers some of the "easier" books just because they are great stories.  And, who is to say an "excellent" reader might not enjoy the break of reading some "brain candy?"  Another benefit is having a collection of books kid have already read that empowers them to take ownership of the library by recommending good books to friends.  It gives them confidence in their ability to read and choose good books and strengthens their friendship bonds.  And, gasp, what if they were to actually talk about the book with their friend!  A travesty, I know.

If you have had the debate in your head of whether you should or should not put easier reads in your library, do it!  Go for it!  Your students will love you for it and be sure to shamelessly give a "simple" book to your best readers.  Also, challenge your readers with higher level reads as well.  College and career ready?  You bet!  Reading is reading, and if the kids are reading books they want to read in their free time, that is preparing them for life long learning.

Do you have any thoughts on this topic?  What are your thoughts on using AR in schools?  What do you think about offering "easy" reads to students who are capable for high-level reading?  Comment below, I look forward to a conversation.

Award Books 2014

So the American Library Association Awards were announced yesterday, and I am pretty excited about the choices they made.  I am really happy for the Michael Printz Award winner Marcus Sedgwick and his book Midwinter Blood.  I read this book over the Christmas Holiday on recommendation from popular book reviewer Michael Cart.  The cover of the book did not really make me want to read it; it looked a little "vampire-ish" and that is not something that really catches my fancy...thank you Twilight phenomena.  The book really drew me in, though.  It grabbed my interest in history as the book starts in the future, but then skips back in time with each passing section.  Admittedly, I kept waiting for a vampire relationship to jump off the pages and bite me, but it never happened.  The story, to me, was so much more about a special place on this earth with special people and magics, than it was about any one character.  I really recommend this book and I am pleased with the award choice.
I am also happy to see that Rita Williams-Garcia won the author award for the Coretta Scott King Award for her book P.S. be eleven.  I have not read this book, but I have really enjoyed other books by Williams-Garcia such as One Crazy Summer and Jumped.
Yaqui Delgado Wants to Kick Your Ass by Meg Medina is a book that I have looked at several times and has intrigued me won the Pura Belpre Award. This inspires me to want to read the book that appears to have a theme of bullying and school related relationships.
Finally, I am really excited to read the Caldecott winner Locomotive written and illustrated by Brian Floca.  First, I love picture books and second, I have not been disappointed by a Caldecott winner in a long time, so I feel confident it will be enjoyable.
What are some of your favorite books from 2013?  Did any of the awards miss the boat in your opinion?  Let me know by commenting below.

First eReader in the Library

So it is official.  I have cataloged the first Kindle eReader for my library.  It has been a year-long effort that included researching different eReaders and book formats, talking to dozens of people about what they are doing, or not doing in most cases, and reading reviews.  More consideration has gone into it than may have been required, but it is done and I have a list of students who are interested in devouring books loaded on the devices in their two week checkout period.
Are eReaders the future?  I have no idea, but right now they are a great way to load dozens of books that are hot and up and coming.  They are cost effective compared to purchasing tablets or other computer devices.  I don't really have any concern of a student checking them out, walking away and damaging or losing them.  If they do, it won't break the bank and should be reasonable to replace.
The eReader of choice for my library is the Amazon Kindle.  I did not find any eReader that really fit what I wanted, which is a reader that I can load books on and tailor for a student then switch the books out and create a new set of books for another student.  That ability does not exist, at least not with the eReaders on my list.  I do like the Amazon Whispercast and the way I can group devices, but this won't be helpful unless there are books that I want on multiple Kindles.  Yes, I have to purchase multiple copies of a book if I want a title on multiple Kindles.  Speaking of purchasing books, I created an eBook order for the Kindles and my order total was $14,324.36.  Sticker shock!!  That was a "little" over my budget.  I discovered that Whispercast takes the order and puts all the books on to all the devices in whatever user group is choosen.   I chose the user group that had all my Kindles. I canceled that order, of course. The solution was to create a User group for each device and do a separate order for each Kindle.  Not a big deal, I guess, except the district office has to divvy out 20+ purchase orders each time I want to put books onto the Kindles.  They have been terrific about working with me, but I imagine it may get old for all of us real quick.  Time will tell on that.
A couple irritants that have gone along with this process is that every Kindle has to have its own email address, so my tech office had to create those.  I am still trying to figure out how to get the Kindles to remember the wifi security key to our schools' network.  Kind of a pain to reconnect constantly but it's not the end of the world.
Some reading this may think this wasn't a good decision.  My wife is in that camp, but she gets to hear all the frustrations.  There are several positives. First, Amazon makes contacting them almost a joy.  I have yet to wait more than 60 seconds to talk to someone and the phone operators know their stuff.  The representatives often didn't tell me what I wanted, but they gave me a straight answer so I could move on to find solutions.  They are even apologetic when a Kindle policy doesn't really work for me.  In these days of bad customer service, waiting on hold, and inadequate knowledge, this was a breath of fresh air.  Another positive, the Kindles are really easy to lock down so the students only have access to books and documents we put on there.  All in all, there isn't anything out there that does exactly what I want, but Amazon and the Kindle make it easy to make adjustments to put these into the hands of kids who want to read.  They even grab the attention of kids who aren't all that interested in reading but like the "gadgety" tool.
I can't wait for the first checkout of these to hear how someone took one of these and read until they couldn't read anymore.  Have you had experience putting a Kindle or other eReader into your library?  I would be interested in reading your stories.

Time to move? NOW!

So I was walking out of my office into the library when I looked over at a row of computers.  There was a girl typing a paper and a boy sitting next to her working.  What caught my eye wasn't that the boy was working on the computer, but he was sitting back in the chair with one leg crossed over the other and a tablet in his lap.  I asked him what he was up to, and he said he was doing some research.  I asked him why he wasn't using the computer.  Thinking he was in trouble, he started to put his tablet away and was sliding his chair in to log in to the computer, but I assured him it was okay that he was using the tablet, I was just wondering why he made the choice to use a tablet with a perfectly good computer in front of him.  He didn't know the answer, but I had a pretty good idea.  He was using the tool he felt most comfortable with, a tablet.
It is time for schools to move on and use the tools with which students want to and need to learn.  Students have always wanted to use the most recent gadgets and technology, so why limit them?  This is a great opportunity for education to show students that using smartphones, tablets and e-readers is okay to learn and communicate with, but we need to teach ethical and proper use of these in the educational and world setting.
I feel that I may be preaching to the choir because many schools seem to be heading the way of one-to-one and BYOD, but it also seems that caution is a hindrance and not a safe open door.  We need to protect students and school networks but we don't need an iron curtain keeping information out and students frustrated.  A moderate security policy with clear expectations as well as instruction of staff and students on proper use of technology would go a long way in creating a 21st century environment.
My vision is that technology isn't locked in a computer lab or classroom or any one room or area in a school, but rather it is a part of the school environment.  Technology could be used anywhere, so learning isn't limited to a specific place, but rather it just happens.  Students find the answer to their query in the hall on the way to class, they complete a presentation at the lunch table, they record an interview in the classroom or office, and on and on.
There are problems that will occur, there always are and there always were even before computer/wi-fi technology.  But with an honest and effective approach, the problems should be minimal.  Is it worth the risk?  I believe so.

The Top 10 (or so)

The results are in and the top book of the first semester at IVC high school is Jay Asher's Thirteen Reasons Why.  It is no surprise that this book, an Abraham Lincoln Book Award Nominee, that addresses relationships we have with others is the most popular book.  I would not be surprised if it shows up in this spot this semester as well.



A very close second and third are Suzanne Collins Catching Fire and Mockingjay, respectively.  If you are wondering, The Hunger Games shows up in a large group tied for ninth on the list.  Rounding out the top five are John Flanagan's The Ruins of Gorlan and Mary Higgins Clark's mystery The Lottery Winner Alvirah and Willy Stories.

Some other notable titles that I was pleased to see out being read are: The Maze Runner, The Graveyard Book (one of my favorite books), Graceling, and The Hobbit.  Also, another Abraham Lincoln Book Award Nominee made a showing in the top 10 as Alexander Gordon Smith's Lockdown came in sixth.

What is Illini Bluffs Library?

It is a place to...

have fun.

get work done.

work with technology.

find a good book.

relax.

Virtual Gaming Education

I came across this video from the Florida Virtual School on Scott McLeod's Dangerously Irrelevant blog. Watch the video, for someone like me who loves computer games (I realize calling them computer games dates me) and a digital native, this is exciting.

The concept of video game as education, which meets reading standards and encourages critical thinking skills, is like finding "the answer." The cost probably takes most districts out of the running to take it out of the dream stage, but what about a classroom application? Here is a simplified blueprint of how this could work. A teacher has certain material to teach in a semester or even quarter, lets say in an English classroom there is literature, writing, grammar and vocabulary. Perhaps there is a mystery/story line/plot that could over-arch the semester and use all of the skills the students need to solve the mystery. Maybe there are clues in the literature that students could gather as they read Shakespeare or Gatsby; communication in the form of memos or letters, with the students could use the vocabulary words; grammar or the poor use of it could scramble messages or students might need to recognize the adverb killer, or a character the students interact with might write only in simple sentences with the lack of adjectives. I don't know, but I feel pretty confident to guess this is what the tech folks and curriculum directors at Florida Virtual School did. This "video game" concept that ties together skills really shows the possibilities in education.

This would take a monumental effort to plan, prep, execute and assess, but that is why schools should be promoting collaboration. That means giving teachers time to work. Not 45 minutes at the beginning of a day once a month, but time to think, discuss, disagree, plan, test, reflect and rewrite. Amazing things happen when that time is given. Also, most schools have librarians who love projects like this. Let's get thinking and make education effective, fun and interesting.